Representative image (stock photo); not the exact product.
The Price Point Changed
Cheap earphones used to be uniformly bad — muddy, peaky, with no coherent tuning intent. That changed over the last few years as Chinese manufacturers applied measurement-driven design to very low-cost single-driver earphones.
The Chu II is among the clearest examples. It costs less than a takeaway and it has a deliberate, broadly neutral tuning that does not embarrass itself against earphones many times the price.
That is genuinely worth knowing, because the assumption that you must spend substantially to get competent sound is no longer accurate at the entry level, whatever it may be higher up.
What You Actually Get
A single dynamic driver, a reasonable cable, a set of tips and a tuning that follows a sensible target curve — enough bass to be enjoyable, an uncoloured midrange, and treble that is present without being harsh.
It will not match a good earphone for detail retrieval, soundstage or bass control. What it does is get the fundamentals right, which is what most cheap earphones fail at.
For anyone who needs earphones for a gym bag, a spare pair for a desk drawer, or a first set to find out whether they care about sound quality, it is close to unbeatable value.
Where The Compromises Are
Build is the clearest one. The housings are simple, and on the original Chu the cable was fixed rather than detachable, which meant a cable failure ended the earphone. The II improved this and cable quality at this price remains modest.
Accessories are minimal and the supplied tips are basic, and tip quality affects fit and therefore sound substantially. Spending a small amount on better tips is a genuinely worthwhile upgrade on cheap earphones.
There is no wireless, no cancellation, no app and no microphone quality to speak of. It is a wired earphone that plays music.
Against The Alternatives
Against expensive earphones, the gap in detail and refinement is real and much smaller than the price difference.
Against cheap wireless earbuds at similar money, the wired Chu sounds dramatically better, because none of the budget went on radios, batteries and chips.
Against the bundled earphones that come with a phone, it is not a close comparison.
Who Should Not Buy It
Anyone needing wireless or cancellation is in the wrong category.
Anyone wanting a durable primary earphone should consider that build and cable quality are modest, though the price makes replacement trivial.
Anyone chasing the last degree of detail should spend more, though they should audition this first to calibrate what the money is actually buying.
The Verdict
Proof that competent sound no longer requires spending much: a deliberate, broadly neutral tuning with the fundamentals right, at a price that makes it an easy impulse purchase.
Build and accessories are modest, and it will not match good earphones for detail or refinement.
Buy a set of better tips alongside — on cheap earphones, tips affect the result more than anything else you could spend the same money on.
At a glance
Pros
- Deliberate, broadly neutral tuning at an extremely low price
- Gets the fundamentals right where most cheap earphones fail
- Sounds dramatically better than wireless earbuds at similar money
- Cheap enough that loss or failure is trivial
Cons
- Modest build and cable quality
- Basic supplied tips that affect fit and sound
- No wireless, cancellation, app or usable microphone
- Will not match good earphones for detail or refinement
Frequently asked questions
Can something this cheap actually be good?
At the entry level, yes — measurement-driven design applied to simple single-driver earphones has changed what is possible for very little money. It will not match expensive earphones for detail, and it gets the fundamentals right where cheap earphones used to fail entirely.
What should I upgrade first?
The tips. On any cheap earphone, tip fit affects bass response and isolation more than anything else, and a small spend on better tips does more for the result than spending the same amount on a slightly better earphone.
How does it compare with cheap wireless earbuds?
Dramatically better sounding, because none of the budget went on radios, batteries and processing. Cheap wireless buys convenience at a very high cost in sound quality, and at this price the difference is not subtle.
Specifications
| Type | Wired in-ear monitor |
| Driver | Single dynamic |
| Tuning | Broadly neutral target curve |
| Cable | Modest quality |
| Accessories | Minimal |
| Wireless | No |
| Recommended upgrade | Better tips |
| Value | Exceptional |
The bottom line
Competent, broadly neutral sound for almost nothing — proof the entry level changed. Modest build, and buy better tips with it.
Check Price on Amazon
